Hello, I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries for minimals. (I did not update luatex, metapost or xetex, so only pdftex binary should be affected.) OS X 10.4 issues will hopefully be resolved soon. (I need a few iterations to figure out which compiler switches are needed to make the binaries work on Tiger. I'll worry about Snow Leopard when first user starts complaining.) Mojca
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries for minimals. (I did not update luatex, metapost or xetex, so only pdftex binary should be affected.)
I compiled a simple tex file, on Ubuntu 8.10, and I think it is working :) Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
2009/3/31 Khaled Hosny:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask someone on any (ancient or not) linux distribution to test if the pdftex binary for linux works OK, just to let me know if I may continue using that machine to compile binaries for minimals. (I did not update luatex, metapost or xetex, so only pdftex binary should be affected.)
I compiled a simple tex file, on Ubuntu 8.10, and I think it is working :)
OK, thanks. Let's hope that it will work now. I have also committed the luatex binary for Mac that hopefully works on Tiger. If anyone experiences troubles again (other than those connected with rapid development that), let me know. Mojca
participants (2)
-
Khaled Hosny -
Mojca Miklavec