On Monday 18 January 2010 13:50:25 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
views63 wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using `` complex analysis'' the output is wrong.
Not really. We (Hans and I) would say that it is now finally right. ;)
but using \ quotation (... ...) can output the correct quotation marks
This is the right way to do it. Alternatively, you can use unicode characters to input the correct quotation marks.
Best wishes, Taco
This is true of many standard TeX ligatures (is this the right word here?) such as ... (\ldots, \dots also works), << (\og), >> (\fg), "` (\glqq), "' (\grqq), ~ (unbreakable space), etc. This can be a bit disturbing for experienced TeX users. OK, \quotation{} is cleaner and of course using unicode characters may be even more readable, sometimes. I have very mixed feelings, as I know how to type ... but I never can recall the keyboard gymnastics necessary to get this in unicode. (Things are even worse on a Mac, as the standard keyboard layout is missing lots of important characters.) Alan