Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hi all,
I've been TeX-doodling with the font shown on the page below: http://www.typography.com/catalog/hoeflertext/ornaments.html
Some of the nicer patterns are predicated on having horizontal as well as vertical elements smashed up next to one another. I find myself having to adjust for little gaps with: \godown[-0.029\bodyfontsize]
Does this ring a bell with anyone?
The last time I had problems with minute offsets, it was Acrobat's fault. Do you also have problems in DVI mode?
Hmm. I do need to examine it in different viewers... Nope. Adobe Acrobat gives the same results as Apple's PDF implementation. I'm a bit stuck with DVI: dvipdfmx has trouble seeing the converted Mac font as a TTF font. (Once I worked through the difference in map file format...) Clearly there's a disagreement on which tables are required. Thanks, though. The negative offset is not a big problem. The only weird thing is the feature interaction I also posted about. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-