![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/29c7bbff49b1599eddb2ec73fd9ffa6e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
24 Mar
2010
24 Mar
'10
9:57 a.m.
On 24 mrt 2010, at 16:10, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Must I really understand from your reply that \setupinmargin[x=y] is not equivalent to \setupinmargin[][x=y]? That is: an absent optional argument is not really optionally absent?
Your [] is not an absent optional argument at all, it is a given optional argument (that is empty).
Point taken. But should that has the effect: "ignore what follows in the second argument?" Because that is what I observe. Hans van der Meer