![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a0f6b595b0e3b7f3abba19eeb8261fc2.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
19 Jun
2009
19 Jun
'09
3:23 a.m.
The key reason for this is, more people are familiar with regexp. so if you can build a 100% compatible regexp module on top of lpeg in ConTeXt, it will be ok, or even better...
There *is* a regexp module on top of LPeg. It's written by Roberto Ierusalimschy, the Lua and LPeg author. Just use it if you want. http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/lpeg/re.html Arthur