Hi Janne,
Personnally I prefer to use the Plain TeX alternative \over (which works fine in ConTeXt), that is
${a \over b}$
instead of
$\frac{a}{b}$
Compare the following two outputs in the example you want to typeset: I think the second is more or less what you want
\starttext
Using \type{\frac} gives:
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s = S, B_u = U}(x) = \frac{e^{-\frac{(u-s)x^2 - 2x(S(u-t) +
U(t-s)) + \frac{(S(u-t) +
U(t-s))^2}{(u-s)}}{2(t-s)(u-t)}}}{\sqrt{2\pi\frac{(t-s)(u-t)}{u-s}}}
\stopformula
\blank
Using \type{\over} gives:
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s = S, B_u = U}(x) = {
e^{-{(u-s)x^2 - 2x(S(u-t) + U(t-s)) +
{(S(u-t) + U(t-s))^2 \over (u-s)} \over 2(t-s)(u-t)}} \over
\sqrt{2\pi {(t-s)(u-t) \over u-s}}}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Best regards: OK
On 28 janv. 2013, at 10:11, Janne Junnila
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific formula I have is
\startformula f_{B_t | B_s = S, B_u = U}(x) = \frac{e^{-\frac{(u-s)x^2 - 2x(S(u-t) + U(t-s)) + \frac{(S(u-t) + U(t-s))^2}{(u-s)}}{2(t-s)(u-t)}}}{\sqrt{2\pi\frac{(t-s)(u-t)}{u-s}}} \stopformula
Thanks, Janne
Roland wrote:
With \dfrac it looks good. With \fraction the minus sign is on the top of the fraction. Best regards, Roland
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________