On 16 Jun 2015, at 15:04, Paul Mazaitis
wrote: I've been working on a BBEdit language module to support editing ConTeXt files:
https://github.com/pmazaitis/ConTeXtBBLM
...with binary releases here:
https://github.com/pmazaitis/ConTeXtBBLM/releases
If there are other BBEdit users here with interest, I'd appreciate feedback. Notes on feature gaps (math?), outright bugs, improvements, and/or fiddly details are all welcome.
Hi, thanks a lot for sharing your module. I was using my own CLM for ConTeXt, but probably I’ll switch to yours now :-) (I especially love the addition of the "callouts" (TODO, etc.) to the functions/sections menu!) Some quick observations/suggestions/thoughts: ## Key/value options [] and content arguments {} The highlighting is broken when there is a space between the command word and the [bracketed options] {or arguments}; unfortunately that’s the way I use to write it ;-) It breaks also when there are line breaks involved, which is often the case when you write longer, "vertical" definitions, for example \setupitemgroup [Legtext] [each] [stopper=, before={\setupwhitespace[none]\blank[small]}, style=\bf, inbetween={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[medium]}, width=1.8em, …] ## Command words \,\;\: : In things like "3000\,mm" the whole "\,mm" gets highlighted. [This may ne a legacy problem, as I should better use directly an appropriate Unicode space.] Highlighting should probably not include chars like "()|": For example in "\starttabulate [|lw(.65\textwidth)|rw(.25\textwidth)|]" the whole "\textwidth)|rw(.25\textwidth)|" part gets command-highlighted. ## Default highlight colors After installation the default highlight colors were all set to black, except for comments. (BBEdit 11.1.2 (3733).) (Though this might be as well a BBEdit problem, since they are still fighting highlighting bugs that have been introduced with the color scheme changes of vs. 11) ## Commands / keywords It’s interesting that you are offering both Command words (via pattern) and Keywords (custom list). In ConTeXt I always thought of them as the same. I’ll surely find a nice use for that :-) Thanks again, best, -- Tom