> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 11:28
> An: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) <denis.maier@unibe.ch>; mailing list for
> ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
> Betreff: Re: AW: [NTG-context] Heading for endnotes / grouped by chapter
> endnotes
>
> On 6/30/2021 10:06 AM, denis.maier@unibe.ch wrote:
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juni 2021 16:20
> >> An: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Maier, Denis
> >> Christian
> >> (UB) <denis.maier@unibe.ch>
> >> Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Heading for endnotes / grouped by chapter
> >> endnotes
> >>
> >> On 6/29/2021 12:53 PM, denis.maier@unibe.ch wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> may I reask the question from below? Would be really great if
> >>> something grouped endnotes were possible...
> >>
> >> i need some lines to the code base for that (everything is actually
> >> already in place to support that)
> >>
> > [...]
> >
> > That looks very promising. Would be great if that missing piece could be
> added!
> it's in the latest
Cool. Thanks. So again something to be wikified.
Two questions related to this relying on the list mechanism:
1. You use this to flush the notes
\setuplist
[part]
[after={\blank[samepage,big]\placelist[endnote][criterium=part]}]
\placelist
[part]
[criterium=all]
Will this interfere with how parts are displayed in the regular table of contents?
2. Does this treat endnotes just like a list entry, with page numbers and so?
And, something seems to e wrong with the numbering of the notes:
The endnote marks in the text are correct.
Best,
Denis
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------