![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/af13db75aa1c24fee635c74fecf93090.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Hans. Only for explanation of my (maybe) crazy request: I can not at this level TeX macros to create, because it creates automatically after opening the CSV file. Although I tried to start creating something with \ csname \ endcsname etc. but my experiments with this method were never successful. In addition with TeX probably I can not work as well as with Lua (for things which in this case I need ie. at low level). Given that I have a CSV file loaded in global variables and header information at my disposal, I Lua everything you need me to do what I need. The problem is that the macros created in Lua I sometimes do not work as well when I create TeX (during the cycle will automatically fall short values). I have a particularly bad experience in this regard with the construction, he sent Taco. Simplified version of "interfaces.definecommand" construction does not in my way of processing the results of what I expected. Module which at the moment I work (in collaboration with Pablo Rodriguez) at the moment is very complex and extensive, and already it slowly begin to lose myself :-), so I try to get any information from the conference. Thank you and also to other counselors too at the conference for their cooperation in solve my problems. Jaroslav Hajtmar Dne 8. 7. 2015 v 20:54 Hans Hagen napsal(a):
On 7/8/2015 4:11 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Thanks Taco very much.
At this point, it really works in simple situations, but in the event that this solution will incorporate into the existing system, then I have big problems with expansion (values are not updated in macros). I need more solutions using something like context.setgvalue, or at least according to the following example. If they could incorporate the remaining two definitions ie \def\simpleA {content when parameter is missing} \def\complexA[#1]{parameter #1}
into luacode (probably encounter a problem with #), so it might work. Can not think of anyone, how it could be done differently? Thanks Jaroslav Hajtmar
Here is minimal example:
\ctxlua{ xlsname='A' content='content when parameter is missing' context([[\definecomplexorsimple\]]..xlsname) %context([[\def\simple]]..xlsname..[[{]]..content..[[}]]) %context([[\def\complex]]..xlsname..'[#1]'..[[{Neco: #1}]]) }
\def\simpleA {content when parameter is missing} \def\complexA[#1]{parameter #1}
why don't you define these commands at the tex level
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________