as far as i am concerned, MKIV is far better than MKII/pdftex, and
have less bugs concerning the internationalization. I use it for
production purpose. I typeset all my essays using luatex, because
pdftex/MKII is messy especially on non-latin typesetting. Yes,
LuaTeX/MKIV had bugs, but Taco and Hans can solve them:) again.
MKII+XeTeX should also produce the right pdf. but I didn't try. (XeTeX
is stable for production, uh?)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Taco Hoekwater
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 22.04.2008 um 15:50 schrieb Yue Wang:
Use LuaTeX+MKIV..
well, sure ... LuaTeX is certainly on my todolist, only not at the end of an almost finished project.
I assume LuaTeX is not yet mature enough for real production needs as MKII is, right? Taco?
No, I do not think that would be wise. Certainly not for a project that is nearly finished.
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________