Am 12.12.2006 um 19:58 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 12.12.2006 um 18:18 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
using "small" and "medium" rather than "8pt" or "10pt" gives some vertical "stretch". Very useful in some situations:
\setupinterlinespace[small] \setupwhitespace[medium]
But what to do if "small" is still too big? And yet the "stretch" is needed?
While I can say ... \blank[.75*medium] ... this operation is not allowed for the two above. So, what to do?
define a new blank
like this (?) ...
\defineblank[smaller][8pt plus 1pt minus 1pt]
... and then ...
\setupinterlinespace[smaller]
... provides a similar "stretch" effect as its bigger brother \setupinterlinespace[small] ?
back on my tex-machine today I've tried the above and ended up in ... ! Missing number, treated as zero. <to be read again> s \currentrelativeinterlinespace ->s maller \setspacingfactor ...imen #2\points \strutdimen #3 \strutdimen \edef #1{\with... \spacing ...skipfactor \to \topskipfactor \by #1\\ \setspacingfactor \systemm... \p!compareprocessactionD ...ommalistelement {#3}#2 \fi \fi \next2 #1,->\p!dodoprocessaction {#1} \doprocesscommaitem ... l.36 \setupinterlinespace[smaller] ? I also tried ... \def\smaller{\blank[.75*small]} ... which has exactly the same result / error-log. Is there another way to "define a new blank"? Steffen