10 Apr
2003
10 Apr
'03
11:43 a.m.
Thursday, April 10, 2003 Patrick Gundlach wrote:
PG> why did you use "counterclockwise simplified..." ? What is this?
I used that to make sure that p didn't have extra points (simplified) and went in a specific direction (counterclockwise); anyway, I rewrote my code:
PG> Well, does it have to be simplified? Is there a chance that there are PG> unwanted (extra) points? Actually I have no idea! I just wanted to be on the safe side of things :) PG> BTW: that looks very nice. Yes, I think so too ;) Thanks. Feel free to use it as needed. I tried to make it as parametric as possible. As soon as Hans provides the hook to determine if the background split or not I'll try to package it into a module. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta