Am 04.03.2011 um 11:33 schrieb Hans Hagen:
I don’t like the __ and ___ either but do you know a better way for good names without using do, dodo, nodo, yes or nop?
we can have module_do_bla or module_x_bla module_xx_bla etc
I think module_bla, module_bla_do, module_bla_redo etc. is better
I find that \module__command and \module___command are hard to distinguish. For helper macros, a better idea might be:
\module_command \module_command! \module_command!!
or
\module_!_command \module_!!_command
In which are these alternatives are better than my module__command, you replace only the _ by !
These commands are easy to distinguish visually. But this will not work for too well for three or four levels. I think that none of the schemes look good for three or four levels. Perhaps we could mix both existing schemes to get something reasonable:
\module_command \module_command! \module_command!do \module_command!redo
or maybe
\module_command \module_command_one \module_command_two \module_command_three
or
\module_command_a \module_command_b \module_command_aa (used by _a)
+1
etc
actually we can use ^ if we want:
\module_^_command \module_^^_command
Just another form of module_!_command or module__command. Wolfgang