![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ac3fbaf0a287c4cffbc9f18fa931586c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:13:27 +0100
Hans Hagen
btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes should be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are not clever enough for that
As Pablo wrote, this just won't happen. It is very rare that *anyone* delivers both screen and print versions of a PDF file (Pragma ADE excepted). This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to contain both versions? I did struggle recently with an Adobe-specific PDF (which I could not even read using Acroread 9) that contained two, in fact three, documents: 1. A form 2. Instructions 3. A page that was shown on non-Adobe readers I do not know enough about PDF and different readers to know how to include several versions, but this would be quite useful. Alan