![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c5ae4f9aa0d3a9bd5376e92b322c3e50.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
5 Apr
2008
5 Apr
'08
9:37 a.m.
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2008-04-05 um 17:08 schrieb David:
(3) \startitemize[n] Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other context.
I don't have the final answer on this, but I have run into this "starts with zero" problem when my corresponding \stopitemize is missing or not in the correct place.
Ah, sorry - I spoke too soon: It happened only with "texexec --once"
That is understandable. ConTeXt now allows \setupitemize[n,reverse] to set up numbers in the reverse order. This also means that ConTeXt needs to run two times to get the numbering right. Aditya