Hi Alan, thanks for your help. That's indeed an option, but not much of a difference to using "\normal" I suppose. In addition, "\text" has the nice feature of preserving the space character, which makes it very useful for lazy people (of course I can add "\," and friends but...). Cheers, Andreas ConTeXt ver: 2012.09.25 21:44 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.1 %%%%%%%%%%%% MINIMAL EXAMPLE %%%%%%%%%%%% \setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext $f_{\mathrm{text and text}_{\mathrm{text and text}_{\mathrm{text and text}}}}$ $f_{\text{text and text}_{\text{text and text}_{\text{text and text}}}}$ $f_{{\normal text}_{{\normal text}_{\normal text}}}$ \stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%% MINIMAL EXAMPLE %%%%%%%%%%%% Am Oct 4, 2012 um 9:27 AM schrieb Alan BRASLAU:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:10:17 +0200 Andreas Mang
wrote: Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that "\text{ ... }" should scale properly when used as super- or subscript, I have prepared a minimal example to demonstrate that it doesn't. In my document I have switched from "\text{ }" to "\normal", which works.
Kind regards, Andreas
ConTeXt ver: 2012.09.25 21:44 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.1
%% MINIMAL EXAMPLE \setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
$f_{\text{text}_{\text{text}_{\text{text}}}}$
$f_{{\normal text}_{{\normal text}_{\normal text}}}$
\stoptext %% MINIMAL EXAMPLE
(*) see "[NTG-context] punctuation vs font switch"
Hello,
I generally use \mathrm{} (maybe this is a leftover from LaTeX practice), and this works fine.
Alan
\setupbodyfont [xits] \starttext $f_{\mathrm{text}_{\mathrm{text}_{\mathrm{text}}}}$
$f_{{\normal text}_{{\normal text}_{\normal text}}}$ \stoptext