On 2015-10-23 14:40, Rik Kabel wrote:
At Wolfgang’s request, a new thread for this subject. I have
cleaned up the example from the July 5 posting, but the problems
are the same as shown there. In July Alan suggested that there
might a bug here, but nothing has been done to address it since
then. Wolfgang suggested (http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg35580.html)
that method=font is required for proper protrusion handling for
quotations.
- When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present
and there is no citation in a
footnote within a startquotation block and a bibliography is
produced, compilation proceeds normally.
- When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present
and there is a citation in a footnote within
a startquotation block and a bibliography is produced,
the compilation complains of a missing right curly. When
allowed to continue to completion the protrusion for the
opening quotation marks does not match the protrusion for
similar marks not produced through \startquotation. Citations
in footnotes outside quotation blocks are not a problem.
Without a bibliography (\placelistofpublications)
- When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present,
the [right] option of \startblockquotation is treated as text
within the quotation. This can be resolved by adding
“leftmargin=” to the \setupdelimitedtext[quotation] command
(but that complicates matters when you want other alignments).
Similarly, the [left] and [middle] options are ignored as
options and appear as text.
- When “method=font” is not present, protrusion for block
quotations (\startblockquotation … \stopblockquotation) is
greater than and not aligned with other protrusion.
- When “method=font” is not present, protrusion for non-block
quotations (\quotation{…}) is not done at all.
- With the older bibliography system, footnotes in citations
in quotation blocks do not cause a halt in compilation.
- With the older bibliography system, item 3 is still a
problem, that is, method=font appears to be inimical to the
left, right, and middle options for \startblockquotation
without regard to the bibliography system in use.
Further testing shows that the failure to compile issue (#1 and #2
above) is tied to processing @ARTICLE bib entries. The failure
occurs in and out of footnotes and startquotation blocks. I really
was too deep into a wrong view of the problem to see that before.
That is pretty clearly a bug.
The issue with method=font and left, right, middle (#3, #4, #5
above) is still problematic. This is not tied to the bibliography
system.
--
Rik