Re: [NTG-context] position of qed symbol in proofs

On 11/11/2014 2:55 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:

...

...

On 10 Nov 2014, at 10:58, Hans Hagen wrote: […] i'm not surprised: eqno only works in a formula and closecommand is not in the formula ... it would not align properly anyway

Oh… I see. So there is not anymore the possibility to finish an enumeration (such as « proof » ine Mikael’s example) with aformula and automatically get the square of qed on the right? This was possible for quite a long time, although personnally I have used it seldom.

Thanks and best regards: OK ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

OK, so I will put the square there by hand from now on.

you can use it but not to put *anything* you like there and expect it to behave ... i really wonder if \eqno ever worked there as it's an "embedded in formulas" command ... if it did, it was definitely a side effect Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------