At 21:07 02/10/2003, you wrote:
bodyfont : bodyfont 6.6pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 6.6pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 4.7pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 4.7pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 7.6pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 7.6pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 5.7pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 5.7pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 11.3pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 11.3pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 9.5pt is defined (can better be done global) bodyfont : bodyfont 9.5pt is defined (can better be done global) systems : begin file 030423_scope at line 33
messages during a texexec run.
is this an incorrect way to specify type size?
there are some sizes predefined, like 8, 9, 10, 11 pt and so; for computer modern each size has its own design size fonts (or fallbacks); so in principle you should define a new size, but i think that -if you can live with the warning- there is no real need for it. alternatively you can define a typeface based on 'one design size fonts' in which case you'd have to provide additional typescripts like: \starttypescript [serif] [default] [size] \definebodyfont [4pt,5pt,6pt,7pt,8pt,9pt,9.5pt,10pt,11pt,12pt,14.4pt,17.3pt] [rm] [default] \stoptypescript and alike Hans