Hi Pablo,
That's not what I'm looking for but rather this:

1.a. blablablabla
blablablabla
b. blablablabla
blablablabla
c. blablablabla
blablablabla

Which explains the use of the key intext
Fabrice


2018-07-31 13:31 GMT+02:00 Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>:
On 07/31/2018 12:18 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> Hello,
> Wolfgang helped me to get this:
>
> 1.a.
> b.
> c.
> 2.a
> b.
> c.
>
> I have unfortunately lost the code he had proposed to me. I get this:
>
> 1.a.
> 1b
> 1 C
> 2.a
> 2.b
> 2.c

Hi Fabrice,

I don’t get your output. I had to remove the "intext" option and I guess
I got what you intend:

    \setupitemgroup
       [itemize][1]
       [color=darkred,
        distance=\spaceamount,
        option={packed,fit,n}]

    \setupitemgroup
       [itemize][2]
       [color=darkred,
        distance=\spaceamount,
        option={packed,fit,a}]

    \starttext
    \startitemize
    \item \startitemize
    \item \input zapf

    \item \input knuth

    \item \input montgomery
    \stopitemize
    \item \startitemize
    \item \input zapf

    \item \input knuth

    \item \input montgomery
    \stopitemize
    \stopitemize
    \stoptext

I hope it helps,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________