Hello,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:06:42 +0100, Hans Hagen
actually, the luacode was doing the right thing as there is a protect/unprotect mismatch (will be fixed); puttingthis at the top of you file works:
\catcodetable\ctxcatcodes
thank you, Hans. This makes both solutions (Ctx generated and Lua generated) equal - [wider] spacing is the same. Just my point of view - the previous native Ctx result (= narrower spacing in subscript when mixing upper and lower case letters) - seemed to me a bit prettier; wouldn't be better to keep the "old" Ctx look (= result without \catcodetable\ctxcatcodes) and to drive Lua to give the same result? Best regards, Lukas -- Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:LPr@pontex.cz] Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pontex@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz] Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Tel: +420 244 062 238 Fax: +420 244 461 038