Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:48:12 +0100:
\bTABLE \eTABLE
nevertheless, i would opt for:
\starttabulate[||i1|i1|i1|i1|] % \starttabulatie \stoptabulate % \stoptabulatie
Hmm, that's something else I haven't quite understood--the pros and cons of the three TABLE mechanisms. I've only bothered to learn \bTABLE, because it's closest to the HTML tables I already knew well, and because it was advertised as being the most powerful. Could someone who knows more than I do give a brief summary of why I would want either of the two other table mechanisms over the newest TABLE?
(btw, some next release will have an example interface to letters and an associated database)
Hans, is this the same release that will include the "splitting tables over multiple pages" feature you've mentioned? Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-