On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:47:42 -0600, Hans Hagen
On 4/6/2015 7:34 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 04/05/2015 09:09 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Dear gang,
In the attached files, watch the behavior of the second footnote: The footnote numeral and accompanying note are out of alignment. Toggle this line:
\setupnotation[footnote] [before={\setupwhitespace[none]},indenting={yes,big},after={\blank[small]}]
On, we get a misalignment. Off, no misalignment. Is this a bug or am I missing something? Thanks in advance for any advice and
Hi Idris,
I’m afraid it may be a bug.
The issue doesn’t show with stable version from 2014.01.03 00:40.
It seems to be triggered when either after or before contain \blank in \setupnotation.
Just in case it might help,
\setting up whitespace in the middle of mechanisms that make an assumption about whitespace when it starts is kind of not-done so this better:
\setupnotation [footnote] [before=, indenting={yes,big}, after=]
with
\startsubject[title=Endnotes] \start \setupwhitespace[none] \placefootnotes \stop \stopsubject
Thanks. But even rewriting the test file this way still doesn't allow me to control *inter*-note spacing: Yes, \setupwhitespace[none] in your example does *both* *intra*-note as well as as *inter*-note spacing but I want to configure inter-note spacing independently. I did find a workaround: \setupnotation [footnote] [before=, indenting={yes,big}, after={\vskip3ex}] % after={\blank}] works, but the \blank version doesn't. So there is still a bug somewhere I think... Best wishes Idris -- Idris Samawi Hamid Professor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523