On 11-9-2010 6:03, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Hi,
line correction leads to unwanted vertical spacing in split natural tables. Example (in both MkII and MkIV):
··8<····························································· %\setuplayout[grid=yes] % not required to reproduce it \starttext \dorecurse{4}{\input knuth\par} \startlinecorrection % fine without line correction \bTABLE[split=yes] % fine with split=no \bTABLEhead \bTR\bTH p\eTH\bTH q\eTH\bTH p or q\eTH\eTR \eTABLEhead \bTABLEbody \bTR\bTC False\eTC\bTC False\eTC\bTC False\eTC\eTR \bTR\bTC True\eTC\bTC False\eTC\bTC True\eTC\eTR \bTR\bTC False\eTC\bTC True\eTC\bTC True\eTC\eTR \bTR\bTC True\eTC\bTC True\eTC\bTC True\eTC\eTR \eTABLEbody \eTABLE \stoplinecorrection \stoptext ··8<·····························································
What am I missing here? Is line correction even recommended for use with tables? Why isn't it ignored if grid typesetting is switched off? Thanks in advance,
that you should not use linecorrection with split ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------