Am 24.06.24 um 11:11 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Am 24.06.24 um 09:31 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
Does it work without --luatex, i.e. does it work for LMTX but not MkIV?
mtxrun --generate --luatex works for me (on OSX), but context --make --luatex doesn’t since forever. Do you have a bin then? And ran mtxrun --generate --luatex ?
Sorry, I didn’t want to hijack the thread.
Good hint – of course I don’t have a luatex binary besides that from TeX live 2023 that doesn’t work with latest LMTX/MkIV. hm, normally it should because nothign gets added to luatex but maybe one of these 'change default behaviour startup due to whataver security
On 6/24/2024 10:02 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: policy' interferes (not much we can do about that apart from trying to be in sync)
TeX Live binaries are a tangled web of symlinks, at least on OSX. I finally found the real binary in /usr/local/texlive/2023/bin/universal-darwin/, but symlinking it into my ~/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin doesn’t help, I get: $ context --make --luatex mtx-context | redirect luametatex -> luatex: luatex --luaonly --socket "/Users/hraban/context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin/mtxrun.lua" --script mtx-context --make --luatex --redirected mtxrun | unknown script 'mtx-context.lua' or 'mtx-mtx-context.lua' … the same "unknown script" error as without the symlink, when the luatex binary is found on the PATH. And yes, "mtxrun --generate --luatex" worked. Might it be a conflict of texmfcnf.lua ? Hraban