On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:15:11AM +0000, Adam Lindsay wrote:
Paul Tremblay said this at Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:04:26 -0500:
Thanks for your contribution... I would feel a bit better if you made the relationship to http://contextgarden.net/Layout clearer.
This page is my best effort at describing how someone who is used to FO would do the same thing in ConTeXt. The page is just one of many I hope to write on FO and ConTeXt.
Perhaps you could make a family of pages like FO_Layout and FO_Fonts, to make "The FO Way" clearer--these things are informative to people coming from ConTeXt and XSL-FO alike...
I see. So if I am understanding things correctly, you just want me to rename my pages? So instead of having Layout, use FO_Layout?
This is from the page itself:
ConTeXt has no equivalent to the FO attributes "margin-right" and "margin-bottom".
"cutspace" and "bottomspace", respectively. I'll agree that the documentation on layout stuff is now lagging behind reality, but there are some sources for this information, like the list archives and: <http://texshow.contextgarden.net/ts.rb? > lang=en&what=desc&if=en&cmd=setuplayout>
Thanks. I'll have a look and change the page. Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * *phthenry@iglou.com * ************************