Re: [NTG-context] contextbeta moved or server down? SOLVED

I am not inclined to react so strongly. In general I am happy when the ISP provides its customers with default save settings. It is best for most people, I think. Perhaps the rsync port 873 should have been opened by default in the firewall, because I suspect more and more people will use it to backup their data over the internet. But in general I can live with changing the modem settings temporarily, because I am updating the ConText minimals infrequently only.

On 8 Sep 2018, at 14:34, juh wrote:

Hi Hans,

I think that this is a scandal, as it is nothing else but censorship by your ISP.

I am a member of a cooperative hoster in Germany (Hostsharing) and Telekom, the biggest German ISP, blocked our mail servers for years in their routers they bundle with internet access services.

We had to complain at the Netzagentur a state agency which has to guarantee net neutrality in Germany – we were successful.

https://www.hostsharing.net/blog/2018/06/24/telekom-speedport-mailblockade-v... hren-beendet/

Maybe the context community should complain somewhere about this.

juh

-- Autoren-Homepage: ......... http://literatur.hasecke.com Satiren & Essays: ......... http://www.sudelbuch.de Privater Blog: ............ http://www.hasecke.eu Netzliteratur-Projekt: .... http://www.generationenprojekt.de

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

dr. Hans van der Meer