Re: [NTG-context] context xml manual

Thanks. I did a context run and now I am asking: shouldn't the API details given for each setup? For example: \xmlflush{NODE} \xmltext{NODE}{LPATH} Not all are so evident, see for example on page 18 the explanation for \xmlprocessbuffer: registers buffer NAME as NAME and ... Which I think could be better (iff I do understand correctly) \xmlprocessbuffer{NAME}{BUFFER}{XMLSETUP} Hans van der Meer

On 12 Oct 2016, at 16:54, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

...

Meer, Hans van der 12. Oktober 2016 um 16:49 Did a small disaster happen in typesetting the XML manual? I find "MISSING SETUP"s all over the place. See the sample page. This is ConTeXt ver: 2016.10.08 00:11 MKIV beta xml-mkiv.tex (line 24):

-\loadsetups[i-en-xml.xml] +\loadsetups[i-xml.xml]

Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________