Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

Hi Hans, Thanks for this new nice feature! However it seems to me that \underdashes produces dots under ords, while \underdots produces dashes… Is it on purpose? Also the name \underrandoms seems misleading too. Best regards: OK

On 15 Feb 2016, at 10:39, Hans Hagen wrote:

On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote:

...

I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the |\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible?

i uploaded a beta where you can test:

test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank

still somewhat experimental

Hans

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________