What do you think about a wiki structure that directly corresponds to errors? http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/tex/00001 http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/context/00001 http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/metapost/00001 When ConTeXt encounters a TeX error, the software writes the error number to standard error: tex error [00001] > error on line 34 in file ...: ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set Eventually this could generate a hyperlink for the corresponding wiki page: tex error [00001] > error on line 34 in file ...: ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set tex error [00001] > Details at: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Errors/tex/00001 Another idea is to create the error pages using markdown. The markdown would serve the following purposes: - Include source code snippets that can be compiled with ConTeXt as another suite of tests - Could be generated into Wiki pages, or local HTML pages, automatically (e.g., I could set up a local web server and not have to rely on the availability of the wiki). The disadvantage is that it becomes slightly more difficult to edit the documents, but there's nothing that states the editing process needs to be one-way (markdown to wiki). There could be a way to go from wiki to updating the markdown source of truth. Thoughts?