Re: [NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:35 AM Luis Montgomery via ntg-context wrote:

Same issue with

\placeformula \startformula \startalign[number=auto] \NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+] \NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula

and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).

L. Montgomery

El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context () escribió:

...

On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:

...

Hi,

[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]

I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.

The following example does not produce the expected result both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –

\starttext

\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula

\stoptext

Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed? [...]

Hi,

Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am stuck with documents without equation numbers.

As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first equation is numbered (while both should be)

\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.

Thanks, Sreeram

Sreeram

It has been fixed, but we have to wait for the next upload. /Mikael