![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5955e8e90611e77ccbfc7721b6112027.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
10 May
2015
10 May
'15
10:36 a.m.
On 05/10/2015 05:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/10/2015 5:36 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...] What I think I understand now is that it is impossible (it doesn’t make sense) to concatenate elements (pardon my inaccuracy) inside one of these elements.
indeed, in that case you need to set a mode after the first and act upon that state
(btw, don't use sequential - stream based - flushing for everything, sometimes it makes more sense to flush explicitly)
Many thanks for the explanation and your advice, Hans. I suspect that the explicit flush requires to have a clearer element tree than the one I have in mind (I’m still eating some leafs :-)). Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk