![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/cf2ff07b06d14aa5d84fc763991c72ed.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Next try, the compact syntax gives the same weird result: ``` \replaceword[replace][au{ff}asse au{ff}asst] \setreplacements[replace] \starttext auffasste auffasse \stoptext ``` I would really like to have correct ligatures. What can I do to help finding the reason for this? (Or is it obvious, and I'm just not seeing it? Best, Denis Am 08.10.2020 um 15:15 schrieb Denis Maier:
Ok, I've commented the whole nolig-german-wordlist out piece by piece, and it looks like it comes down to this:
``` \replaceword[eka][auffasse][au{ff}asse] \replaceword[eka][auffasst][au{ff}asst]
\setreplacements[eka]
\starttext auffasste auffasse \stoptext ```
Uncommenting one of the \replacewords makes the wrong replacement disappear. But I don't see why "auffasste" should trigger an replacement. What is happening here?
Best, Denis ___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________