Op 3 jun 2011, om 18:28 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported as pdf files. This was too cumbersome for me, and does not agree with the tex philosophy. I therefore gave up.
we process docs with cals tables here
Yes, you surely do.
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the directives is not enough, at least the cals tables in my valid xml docbook document were never typeset.
With help from Aditya I managed to typeset a document which contains merely a cals table. I then thought this was going to be the first step to processing my xml file which contains a number of tables. But alas ...
The tables in my document were skipped like any other unknown xml tag. I must have done something wrong. But what? There were no replies to my postings. In the end I felt silly for daring to posing a problem other people apparently had no problems with whatsoever.
So, if you should embark on this track, be aware that typesetting xml is more complicated than a ConTeXt document, that the knowledge about it is not widespread yet, that you rely on the happy few who do know, and it may take a lot of time to find out things yourself.
Robert
For some reason finetuning of, for example, the positioning of graphics, and headers as widows is more difficult than in a context document, at least I got this impression.
the same renderer is used so it should be the same