On 08/12/2018 10:10 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
[...] What does disturb me, however, is that I have this one chapter where the wrong note number is indicated (note 19 is referred to as note '18'), and I do not know why. Could it be that this is because earlier in the chapter I have also used
I wasn’t able to compile your source, but this works fine: \starttext \dorecurse{30}{a\footnote{Zapf.} } \startlocalfootnotes[n=0,conversion=characters,location=none] \bTABLE \bTR \bTD 1 \footnote{\dorecurse{10}{abcd }} \eTD \bTD 2 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 \eTD \bTD 10 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \placelocalfootnotes \stoplocalfootnotes \dorecurse{30}{e\footnote{Other.} } \footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […]} \dorecurse{30}{b\footnote{Knuth.} } … \footnote{See n.~\in[uvu-avu] on p.~\at[uvu-avu].} \stoptext
and that this somehow interferes with the referencing of other footnotes? That is the only difference I see between this chapter and the others.
Without the source, all I can say is that it shouldn’t interfere. A simple way to check it would be to comment out the fragment with the local footnotes, compile and see what happens with the referenced number. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk