![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4e9e1d8d1a9e48815e89a0c42439fd82.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
6 May
2006
6 May
'06
4:37 p.m.
On Sat, 06 May 2006 09:51:38 +0200, Hans Hagen
nico wrote:
Hello,
When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears in the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a known limitation?
of boxed stuff, indeed, so we need to postpone and flush ....
Thanks, it works fine. But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that putting footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the description definition. If the term does not contain a footnote, it is not wrapped. Regards, BG