On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:56 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K mailto:mroge02@emory.edu> wrote:
XML seems a nice way for machines to deal with data. But it's not a very human way to speak. I mean, if I write "\section{One}...\section{Two}" isn't it obvious that section One ends when section Two begins? Why should I have to write \endsection, when the machine can do the bookkeeping for me? The start/stop mechanism is nice as an option, if you plan to produce an XML document from ConTeXt. However the XML translator could implement 'if not first section then "</section><section>" else "<section>"' and add "if in_a_section then "</section>"' when \stoptext is reached.
Hm, consider this
\section{One} \input knuth
Text
\section{Two} \input knuth
and
\startsection{One} \input knuth
\stopsection
Text
\startsection{Two} \input knuth
\stopsection
In the last one it's clear that Text is not in the section One or in the section Two: In the first one, Text is in section One --- but how can I put Text so that is not in section One and not in section Two ?
Most of the time section One ends where section Two begins, but it's not true that *always* section One ends where section Two begins : infact the last one is a legal example.
I agree. When I said start/stop mechanisms are nice options, I had in mind they are useful, even indispensable, alternatives for certain sorts of structuring, as your example shows -- at the time of writing, I focused on XML. I could equally say \section is a nice option. Still, if I want to write a paper that consists of a sequence of sections, it's easier to just use \section, and an XML translator could be written to mark it up accordingly.
________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
