On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:01:13 -0600, Olivier
Interesting, I was thinking about something similar recently:
A user should be able to define or augment a database such that many-to-most ties are done automatically:
I am a bit affraid by such a feature: there are cases where it is hard to decide (automatically, because it means going down to the grammatical level) if a tie has to be added or not. Therefore the end user always have to choose the right thing to do: in one case, he has to add ties when needed, in the suggested case he has to remove them. It seems to me that the original problem is transformed into another dual one. (Of course, this might prove useful if there are less exceptions in the end, but I'm a bit sceptical.)
Thus, it should be a completely configurable by the user, then the user can manage the exceptions. Based on my experience, it would save time to have the option of a general framework -- and deal with the 10%+/- of exceptions, than to have to enter every tie manually, and then proofread to make sure you got the 90%+/- right. I'm sure we could come up with a reasonable, flexible framework for this... Best wishes Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid, Editor-in-Chief International Journal of Shi`i Studies Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523