On 06/20/2012 04:40 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
I uploaded a version that has the bTABLE mechanism reorganized (different low level names etc). Hopefully nothing got broken in the process. Unfortunately it is broken. Minimal example:
\starttext \bTABLE \bTR\bTD[nc=2] r1c1 \eTD\eTR \bTR\bTD r2c1 \eTD\bTD r2c2 \eTD\eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Error message: ! Missing number, treated as zero. system > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Missing number, treated as zero ... 1 \starttext 2 3 \bTABLE 4 \bTR\bTD[nc=2] r1c1 \eTD\eTR 5 \bTR\bTD r2c1 \eTD\bTD r2c2 \eTD\eTR 6 >> \eTABLE 7 8 \stoptext 9 <to be read again> \relax \2>>1 ...l_ntb_get_dis \scratchcounter \fi \relax \advance \scratchcounter \... \redorecurse ->\expandrecursecontent \dodorecurse <to be read again> { <inserted text> 2 \dodorecurse ... \expandafter {\the \innerrecurse }{#2} ... l.6 \eTABLE ?