11 Jun
2009
11 Jun
'09
9:25 p.m.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
- or setuptex should be rather an executable, that prints out the environment to apply, then one would do something like this: eval `setuptex` (cleaner solution, but some work to do and all minimal-users must change their habits...)
I theory adjusting PATH should do, but it's a nice proposal :)
So TEXMFCACHE and TEXMFOS are not needed? And what about the praxis in contrast do the theory? Here my little test: unset TEXMFOS unset TEXMFCACHE context test -> MTXrun | unknown script 'context.lua' or 'mtx-context.lua' Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/