Good afternoon. Many thanks for your answer. Hans Hagen wrote:
2) Some accents do no work, for instance \"o (at least this doesn't work: \loadmapfile[psclean.map]
don't use that one, context will load map files for you (like il2-.....)
Hm. It doesn't. I have to play a little with the distribution. teTeX 3.0 is much different from the old one, so it's possible I do some stupid things.
- at the last bachotek there was a talk about czech type design and one of the remarks was that fo rmany fonts this whole accent business was more a matter of taste than of quality (i will not quote the speaker on czech typesetting tradition here-)
Yes, it's about tastes. But I strongly do not like Latin Modern, especially iacute in sans bold. :-) Simply, I'm used to CS fonts. :-) And perhaps Latin Modern will be improved in the nearest future. I'll try to get used to it.
- just curious: do you always use cm fonts? there are other fonts with math nowadays
Well, I teach four different courses and I try to typeset documents for each course with a different font: Microeconomics with Computer Modern (CS fonts in Type1), Neoclassical Macro with Palatino (URW Palatino + math glyphs from pxfonts), Monetary Economics with Concrete (CM Super in Type 1 + math glyps in Metafont), and New Institutional Economics with Times (URW Times + math glyphs from txfonts). Are there more free fonts with math support? Other documents (with no math) I typeset with more fonts. Many thanks once more. I wish you and the rest of the folk at this mailing list Merry Christmass and Happy New Year Eve. Michal Kvasnicka