=> Could one comunicate "how to scan them for infomation" or must that stay a secret?
they are easy to understand. [I repeat: "easy to understand"!]
I totally agree with you, it's really useless to invite to read the sources without providing a tutorial on source reading for non expert TeX users.
Ulrich Dirr, who had posed the question about his kind of footnotes asked back 21.07.2008 at 09:09:
O.k. I could look in the source too, but where did you read 'location=normal'? Also I don't know what other option are allowed, e.g., in \numbercommand or \split. Only the default values are here as I understand.
I support this question (only that I don't know how to look in the sorce yet...)
Me too Best -a- -------------------------------------------------- Andrea Valle -------------------------------------------------- CIRMA - DAMS Università degli Studi di Torino --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ --> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle --> andrea.valle@unito.it -------------------------------------------------- " Think of it as seasoning . noise [salt] is boring . F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring . F(noise, blah) can be really tasty " (Ken Perlin on noise)