On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:48, Hans Hagen
wrote:
In the examples I mentioned (below), running ‘context’ on the first produces large colons, whereas ‘luatex’ on the second does not. The latter looks right to me.
define 'luatex' ... it's all about choices that macro packages make (or made in the past)
I use Tex Live 2015 that came last month. $ luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.80.0 (TeX Live 2015) (rev 5238)
There is a similar issue with integral symbols, where somehow ConTeXt add additional spacing after it. http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2015/082541.html
— context — \setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\setupformulas[location=left]
\begingroup\lccode`\~=`\:\lowercase{\endgroup \let~}\colon \mathcode`\:="8000 %
\starttext
The function $f: A → B$, $g\colon A → B$.
we could add a mathsymbol entry but I leave that to Aditya to decide
{ adobename="colon", category="po", cjkwd="na", description="COLON", direction="cs", linebreak="is", mathclass="relation", --mathsymbol=0x2236, unicodeslot=0x3A, },
Should it be 'mathclass=“relation”’? Mathematically, relations have extra space at both sides, whereas in the function $f: A → B$, there should not be much space before the “:”.