Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 07.12.2007 um 10:06 schrieb Hans Hagen:
can you check the fonts being used? maybe older docs use ec and newer texnansi and kerning as well as ligs may differ
checking with acrobat the fonts actually used in the two pdfs gives both the same result, no change:
NimbusRomNo9L-Medi (embedded Subset) Type: Type 1 Encoding: Custom NimbusRomNo9L-Regu (embedded Subset) Type: Type 1 Encoding: Custom NimbusRomNo9L-ReguItal (embedded Subset) Type: Type 1 Encoding: Custom rtxmi (embedded Subset) Type: Type 1 Encoding: Built-in
nevertheless the two logs also have differences regarding fonts:
with version 2007.08.09:
fonts : using map file: lm-texnansi {/usr/local/texlive/2007/texmf-dist/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-texnansi.map} fonts : using map file: original-base {/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.
map}
now:
fonts : using map file: original-base {/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-base.
map}
Any idea?
switch to ec encoding and see what happens ... in the past there were no texnansi cmr files (only pseudo ec == aer) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------