![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 12:48:36PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Marks don't get positioned correctly unless all marks are supplied, if one mark is omitted, the next mark will be positioned at the first anchor point, not in the second one etc, in some cases it'll even not positioned on the anchor point at all.
In the attached sample, the first word in the line is correct, subsequent ones aren't. (The font used: http://raqm.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/fonts/simplenaskhi/SimpleNaskhi.ttf) can you check the new beta?
It is fixed in the beta, thanks.
Now I found another bug, when having two marks on the same base glyph, the first one is positioned correctly but not the second one. See the attached sample (I swapped the marks on the next word).
another attempt .. can you coordinate your tests with idris (he collects test snippets so that eventually we have some kind of regression test) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------