Hi Peter, hi all! On 2010-04-17 <08:52:05>, Peter Münster wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof
Sorry, I had forgotten to answer your main-question:
\def\foottrack#1{\expanded{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple("#1")}}}} Thanks very much, this does it!
and, if possible, how do I interaction-proof macros in general?
I don't know, but I suppose \expanded{} can help in most cases.
Adding that one to my “try first”-list seems reasonable. There's a macro \expanded defined in syst-aux.mkiv but it mentions certain “recent TeXs” that have it builtin as a primitive -- which one am I using in mkiv? The LuaTeXbook mentions an extra primitive “\expanded” taken from pdfTeX. Are they equivalent? Thanks a lot for your help! Philipp
Cheers, Peter
-- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments