On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:43:24 +0100
Hans Hagen
On 1/27/2016 10:05 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
The new code appears to work in general, but only if no shading to transparent is being used:
\definecolor [trans] [a=multiply, t=.5, s=.5] \starttext \startMPcode % works fill fullcircle scaled 10cm withcolor \MPcolor{trans};
fill fullsquare xyscaled (15cm, 15cm) withshademethod "linear" withshadevector (0,1) % works withshadecolors (red,\MPcolor{blue}) % fails %% withshadecolors (red,\MPcolor{trans}) ; \stopMPcode \stoptext
How to make transparent shadings work with the new mechanism?
withtransparency (1,.5)
However, this makes the entire shade transparent. How to shade from one colour to transparent using withtransparency to achieve an effect like in the example below? \definecolor [trans] [a=multiply, t=0] \setupbackgrounds [page] [background=color, backgroundcolor=lightgray] \starttext \startMPcode fill fullsquare xyscaled (15cm, 15cm) withshademethod "linear" withshadevector (0, 1) %% colour doens't match %% withshadecolors (red, lightgray) %% output is ok with \MPcolor withshadecolors (red, \MPcolor{lightgray}) %% ?? %% withtransparency (1, .5) ; \stopMPcode \stoptext Furthermore, why do the tex and MP colours differ? Wouldn't it make sense to use the same colour definitions? Or was that intentional? Marco