![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5a39f1335b6eff433673ed987859fb24.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 2008-04-29 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
I just tried the following on Context Live:
\starttext \startitemize[n] \item one \item two \startitemize \item a \item b \stopitemize \item three \stopitemize \stoptext
and the first itemize starts at 0. Remove the inner itemize and it starts at 1.
Is this a feature or a bug? How do I get around it?
I can confirm that here. This is indeed a bug.
I reported some weeks ago that numbering starts always at 0 with --once I guess Hans & Co went after the dictum of Dijkstra[0], as quoted recently by Knuth[1], that counting should start at 0 ;-) [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edsger_W._Dijkstra [1] http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1193856 Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)