Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Mikael, Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: %%% begin derivatives-prime-4.tex \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Compare the position of the prime sign in $f'/g$ in these two expressions: the first one using \type{{... \over ...}} \startformula \left({f \over g}\right)' = {f' \over g} - {f \over g^2}g' \stopformula (which yields a correct position of the prime for $f'$ in $f'/g$), and the second using \type{\frac{...}{...}} \startformula \left(\frac{f}{g} \right)' = \frac{f'}{g} - \frac{f}{g^2} g' \stopformula which yields a prime sign for $f'$ a little bit lower. \stoptext %%% end derivatives-prime-4.tex

On 4 Jun 2017, at 19:42, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:

[…]

I hate to bring this up again, but look at the attached output of

%%% %\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]

\starttext \startformula f'(0)=2\frac{f'(0)}{2} \stopformula \stoptext %%%

The prime in the fraction is in my opinion too low (it is more clear in the example with lucida).

/Mikael ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________