5 Feb
2009
5 Feb
'09
8:58 p.m.
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:49 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Here is a ConTeXt version of LaTeX's \g@addto@macro macro.
\long\def\addmacro#1\to#2% better name needed {\begingroup \scratchtoks\expandafter{#2#1}% \xdef#2{\the\scratchtoks}% \endgroup}
\addmacro\relax\to\FlushStep
This seems to be just another work-around. Wouldn't it be better, to adjust the definition of FlushStep in s-pre-60.tex?
Like this for example: \def\FlushStep{\iftrialtypesetting\else\StopStep\NextStep\StartStep \fi\relax}
1. Only Hans can do this. 2. This is also what happens with my macro. 3. I think it's better to use my macro than to use manual patched \FlushStep in your file. Wolfgang